QA for vibe coders
You shipped it fast. Now let a human make sure it holds.
AI got you from idea to working app in a weekend. But “works on my machine” isn't “works for my users.” BugPort connects you with real QA testers who exercise your build on real browsers and devices and hand back reproducible bug reports — before your launch does it for you.
In a Stanford study, developers with an AI assistant wrote less secure code — and were more likely to believe it was secure.
That false-confidence gap is the whole risk of vibe coding: the app runs, the demo works, and you feel done. A tester who didn't build it — and isn't fooled by knowing how it's “supposed” to work — is the fastest way to find what you can't see.
Source: Perry et al., “Do Users Write More Insecure Code with AI Assistants?” (Stanford, 2023)
From “it works for me” to actually validated
No QA team, no test plan, no problem.
Send your build URL
Paste the link to your deployed app — Vercel, Netlify, Replit, a custom domain, whatever you shipped on. Tell us what it's meant to do.
A real tester tries to break it
A human QA tester runs the flows your users will run — signup, payment, the core feature — on browsers and devices you probably didn't test, and pushes on the edges.
Get a plain-language report
Every issue comes back as a BugPort report with a screenshot or recording, the console error, the failing request, and steps to reproduce — ranked so you fix what matters first.
Fix it (with your AI, or ours)
Each finding has enough context to hand straight to your coding assistant or a developer. Re-test when you're done to confirm the fix actually landed.
Keep going
Validation that fits an indie budget
You don't need an enterprise QA contract to get a human to check your work. Bring on testing when you're about to launch, and keep every report in a free BugPort workspace.
Frequently asked questions
What counts as a “vibe-coded” app here?
Anything you built mostly with an AI coding assistant — Cursor, Claude Code, v0, Lovable, Replit, Copilot — where you shipped fast and didn't write a formal test plan. If it's deployed and has real users (or is about to), it's a fit.
I'm not a professional developer. Will the report make sense?
Yes. Reports are written in plain language with a clear severity and reproduction steps, and each one carries enough technical context (the console error, the failing request) to paste straight into your AI assistant to fix.
What will the testers actually check?
The flows that lose you users if they break: signup and login, payments and checkout, your core feature, mobile and cross-browser behavior, and obvious broken states. You can tell us where to focus.
How is this different from asking an AI to review my code?
An AI reviews the code you already wrote — often with the same blind spots that produced it. A human tester uses your live app like a real user on real devices and finds what breaks in practice, not just what looks wrong in the source.
How fast do I get results?
We match you with a tester and follow up quickly — typically within one business day — so you can validate before a launch, not weeks after it.
Get your vibe-coded build validated
Drop your app URL and where to send the report. A real QA tester takes it from there.
No spam. A human reviews every request before testing starts.