Human QA testing
Real testers break your app before your users do
Automated checks miss the things that make users bounce. BugPort connects you with human QA testers who exercise your real app on real browsers and devices, then hand back reproducible bug reports — screenshots, logs, and steps included.
Shipping fast is easy. Shipping something that holds up under real users is the hard part.
The bugs that cost you signups rarely show up in your own testing — they live in the browser you don't use, the slow connection, the edge case you didn't think to try. A human tester who didn't build the thing finds them fast.
How on-demand QA works
Tell us what to test
Share your app or build URL and what matters most — the signup flow, checkout, a specific feature, or the whole thing.
A real tester runs it
A matched QA tester exercises your app on real browsers and devices, doing the things your users will do and the things they shouldn't.
You get reproducible reports
Every finding comes back as a BugPort report with a screenshot or recording, console and network evidence, and clear steps — ranked by severity.
Fix and re-test
Work through the list in your BugPort workspace, ship the fixes, and re-test to confirm — the same dashboard your developers already use.
Pick your path
Pay for the testing you need
Bring on human QA when you need it and keep the reports in the same workspace as the rest of your bugs. See how QA and workspace pricing fit together.
Frequently asked questions
Who are the testers?
Human QA testers in the BugPort network. You can browse their profiles and specialties before you book — no bots, no automated-only scans dressed up as testing.
What do I get back?
Reproducible bug reports in your BugPort workspace: each with a screenshot or recording, console and network evidence, the environment, and clear reproduction steps, ranked by severity.
Do I need my own QA team?
No — that's the point. This is for teams and solo builders who don't have QA in-house but still want a real person to validate the build before it reaches users.
Does this replace automated testing?
It complements it. Automated checks catch regressions cheaply; human testers find the usability and edge-case failures automation can't. Use both.
Get your build tested by a real person
Share your app URL and where to send the report. We'll match you with a QA tester.
No spam. A human reviews every request.